There is a stack of builder contracts on my desk most weeks, sent by homeowners who want a quick read before signing. The contracts come from very different builders — production builders, semi-custom builders, true custom builders — and the boilerplate varies in the details. But the clauses that cause real problems are remarkably consistent. After enough of these reviews, you can find the landmines in a residential construction contract in about twenty minutes if you know the section names to skip to.
This article is the short version of that twenty-minute read. If you are about to sign a builder contract, take it to the section named in each of the following, and read that section closely.
"Limitation of Liability" — the most dangerous paragraph in the contract
Most production builders include, somewhere in the back half of the contract, a section captioned "Limitation of Liability," "Sole and Exclusive Remedy," or "Disclaimer of Warranties." The language varies; the function does not. The clause attempts to do three things:
Cap the builder's monetary exposure — sometimes at the contract price, sometimes at a small fraction of it, sometimes at a fixed dollar amount disconnected from the project size
Eliminate consequential and incidental damages — meaning the carrying costs, alternative-housing costs, and resale-value losses that often dwarf the cost of the defect itself
Disclaim implied warranties — including, in particular, the implied warranty of workmanlike construction that Colorado common law otherwise provides
Every piece of that clause is independently fixable. When I red-line this section, the changes I push for are:
Personal injury and wrongful death carved completely out of any cap (no exceptions)
The implied warranty of workmanlike construction left intact rather than disclaimed away
Any monetary cap set at or above the full contract value rather than some fractional figure
Consequential-damage carve-outs restricted to a short, defined list rather than worded as a blanket bar
If the builder will not budge on the clause, the realistic alternative is to read it carefully, understand what you are accepting, and price the exposure into whether you sign at all.
"Time" — the substantial-completion definition matters more than the date
Builders frequently print a "completion date" in the contract that turns out to be more wish than commitment. What controls is not the date itself but how completion is defined. Specifically I look for:
A clear written definition of what "substantially complete" means in this contract — usually framed as habitable, useable, and down to punch-list items only
Language making time material — without it, Colorado law tends to read deadlines as soft targets
A daily delay-damages number bearing some reasonable connection to your actual carrying cost while the project drags on
A force-majeure list short enough that you could read it aloud — open-ended phrases such as "market conditions" or "industry-wide disruption" are the loophole
Finding all four in residential boilerplate is unusual. Finding none of them is the recipe for the multi-month overruns I see followed by the builder's lawyer insisting nothing was breached.
"Change Orders" — read it for what it requires the homeowner to do
The change-order clause looks routine, but it is one of the clauses that most often defeats homeowner claims after the fact. Look for:
A requirement that all changes be in writing, signed before work proceeds
A clear pricing methodology for changes — unit prices, lump sum, or T&M with a markup cap
A reasonable change-order administrative fee — anything above 10–15% is aggressive
A prohibition on builder unilateral changes without owner consent
If the contract says the builder can make "non-material changes" or "field changes" at the builder's discretion, ask what each of those phrases means and demand it in writing. "Non-material" and "field change" are the two phrases I see most often invoked by builders after the fact to defend something the homeowner never agreed to.
For the broader change-order discussion, see drafting effective change orders.
"Allowances" — what happens at the overage
Production builders use allowances heavily — pre-specified dollar budgets for items like cabinetry, flooring, fixtures, and appliances that the homeowner chooses later. The clause to find says how overages are handled. Specifically:
Is the overage handled as a change order, with a written signed amendment, or is it added to the next invoice?
Is there a markup on overage amounts? At what rate?
What happens if the homeowner selections come in under allowance? (Frequently the contract is silent, meaning the builder pockets the savings.)
The "change-order-treatment" answer is the right answer. The "invoice-line-item" answer is the one that turns a $20,000 cabinet allowance into a $34,000 surprise without anyone having signed anything for the difference.
"Warranties" — the document, not the paragraph
The contract usually has a paragraph titled "Warranty" that incorporates a separate warranty document by reference. The paragraph is not what matters; the document is. Before you sign the contract, demand a copy of the actual warranty document and read it. Specifically:
What is warranted, by duration: workmanship (typically 1 year), systems (typically 2 years), structural (typically 10 years, sometimes longer)
The claims procedure — how you give notice, who responds, what timeframes apply
The exclusion list — and whether the exclusions swallow the warranty
The dispute-resolution path for warranty claims, which may differ from the general contract
A common pattern in builder warranties is to require the original builder to be given multiple repair attempts before the homeowner can hire an outside contractor or pursue legal remedies. This sounds reasonable in the abstract; in practice it can produce a year of unsuccessful repair attempts before the homeowner has any other path.
"Dispute Resolution" — read it twice
Most builder contracts contain a mandatory arbitration provision. Very few of those provisions are written evenly for both sides. The five questions worth answering before you sign one:
Where will the hearing physically occur, and is that somewhere you can actually appear?
How is the arbitrator chosen — by mutual selection from a neutral roster, or from a panel the builder effectively controls?
What is the fee structure — equal split, prevailing-party shift, or a one-way loser-pays clause aimed at the homeowner?
What discovery is permitted — meaningful, restricted, or none at all?
Is collective action waived?
A fair arbitration clause is workable. An unfair one — distant venue, captive arbitrator, one-way fee-shifting, no discovery — operates in practice as a pre-emptive concession that no claim you might bring is going to be economically worth pursuing.
"Mechanic's Lien Waivers" and Payment Provisions
Two items in the payment section deserve close attention:
A contractual obligation that the builder collect and turn over lien releases from each trade and supplier as a precondition to each progress payment. Without that mechanism, writing the builder a full check provides you no immunity from a sub or supplier filing against your title later.
Holdback at every draw — most commonly in the 5–10% range — released only once the project is fully done and the punch list resolved. That holdback is, practically speaking, the entire reason a builder returns calls during the final two weeks of a job.
If neither shows up in the contract, you are signing an arrangement in which full payment does not actually extinguish your exposure.
For a related discussion of subcontractor-payment dynamics, see pay-if-paid vs. pay-when-paid clauses.
"Termination" — your exit, not just theirs
It is common for builder boilerplate to give the builder a broad termination-for-convenience right while limiting the homeowner's exit to a narrow set of for-cause grounds. Both sides of that asymmetry are worth reading. Specifically:
What grounds the homeowner can actually invoke to walk away
How the notice-and-cure procedure operates — typical residential clauses set a week or two of written notice with an opportunity to fix
The dollar accounting on a homeowner termination — how the builder's claim for partially completed work gets computed, and by whom
Whether terminating for cause also wipes out the warranty obligations the builder already accrued (the contract should say it does not)
Where the asymmetry is severe, ask for the homeowner-side language to mirror the builder-side language. For the separate question of when delays themselves justify termination, see terminating a construction contract for delays.
The twenty-minute read, summarized
If you only have twenty minutes with the contract before signing, spend it on these sections, in this order:
The damages-and-liability paragraph (whatever it is captioned)
How "substantial completion" is defined, and whether time is treated as material
The change-order procedure, and whether a writing is required up front
The actual warranty exhibit, not the in-contract reference to it
The arbitration paragraph in full, including the rules incorporated by reference
The payment schedule, the lien-release mechanism, and the holdback
Both directions of the termination clause, looking for asymmetry
A serious Colorado builder will engage with each of these items without taking offense. A builder who treats the questions as confrontational is communicating something useful — and it is easier to hear that signal now than after the foundation is poured.
For the strategic-negotiation companion to this clause-by-clause read, see negotiating Colorado construction contract terms.
Have Questions About Construction Contracts?
Our experienced construction defect attorneys are here to help. Schedule a free 15-minute screening call to discuss your situation.
